A new Catholic Church
A Vatican source has disclosed a psychological trauma of John
Paul II. Whenever Vatican investigators brought the results of their vetting
process regarding an individual's candidacy for bishop, cardinal, or other
office, and they revealed he was a homosexual, John Paul II would refuse to
believe it.
He did so because accusing someone of homosexuality was a standard practice
of the Communist government in his native Poland regarding anyone it regarded
as an enemy of the state. From his ordination as a Catholic priest in 1946 to
elevation to Archbishop of Krakow in 1963 and Cardinal in 1967, the then Karol
Wojtyla witnessed this personal destruction repeatedly. So traumatized, he
summarily dismissed such accusations as Pope, and would approve the elevation of
anyone so accused.
This is why the Catholic Church, from Bishops in Boston to the Vatican
itself, is riddled with homosexuals today. This also explains the hysterical
reaction of homosexuals, such as writer Andrew Sullivan, to Cardinal Jozef
Ratzinger succeeding John Paul II as Pope Benedict XVI.
The day of the Habemus Papum (We have a Pope!) announcement on April 19,
Sullivan denounced the new pontiff as a Grand Inquisitor who had
declared a war on modernity and would launch a attack on individual freedom. Yes,
the famous commentator who once pretended to be conservative has figured it out:
the Catholic Church is now going to be in forthright moral opposition to the
modernity of homosexual priests and the individual freedom of molesting
young boys.
As the Dean of the College of Cardinals and the Prefect of the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Ratzinger learned who the homosexuals
are in the Vatican and the almost 3,000 dioceses in the world. As Pope Benedict
XVI, he will encourage their departure from the priesthood.
In his Good Friday homily this year, he condemned thefilth there is in the
Church,making it clear he was referring to priest-pedophiles. In a Letter to
the Bishops composed in 1986 and printed in the National Catholic Register, he wrote:
Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it
is a more or less strong tendency ordered to an intrinsic moral evil, and
thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder.
He clearly recognizes what the media calls the Church's 'sex-abuse
scandal' is a left-wing excuse to attack Catholicism as such, because the media never condemned and always tried to cover-up the pederasty causing the scandal. He
thus condemns the attack:
In the Church, priests also are sinners. But I am personally convinced that
the constant presence in the press of the sins of Catholic priests, especially
in the United States, is a planned campaign, as the percentage of these
offences among priests is not higher than in other categories, and perhaps it is
even lower.
As a genuine Christian who believes in forgiveness and understanding, he
despises the mistreatment of homosexuals:
It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of
violent malice in speech or in action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from
the Church's pastors wherever it occurs.
Yet however much sympathy he has for an individuals struggle with an
inclination towards homosexuality, he nonetheless views its practice as an
intrinsic moral evil,and will not tolerate its presence in his Church.
The hate and vindictiveness of homosexuals such as Sullivan is made most
obvious when he declares his wish for a coming civil war within
Catholicism brought about by Benedict XVI. Blinded by their prejudices, they do no see there will be noemptying of pews,noaccelerating exodus among American
Catholics, as they hope for. Just the opposite. There will be a return to the
pews, an accelerating influx, as Pope Benedict XVI returns his Church to
traditional morality.
Benedict XVI is going to give people what they spiritually hunger for and no
longer find in their pews today: a firm place to make their moral stand. This
Pope is going to regenerate the moral revival of Christianity to the great
benefit of all Christendom, to the great benefit of Western Civilization, and
to the great frustration of its enemies.
Paul II. Whenever Vatican investigators brought the results of their vetting
process regarding an individual's candidacy for bishop, cardinal, or other
office, and they revealed he was a homosexual, John Paul II would refuse to
believe it.
He did so because accusing someone of homosexuality was a standard practice
of the Communist government in his native Poland regarding anyone it regarded
as an enemy of the state. From his ordination as a Catholic priest in 1946 to
elevation to Archbishop of Krakow in 1963 and Cardinal in 1967, the then Karol
Wojtyla witnessed this personal destruction repeatedly. So traumatized, he
summarily dismissed such accusations as Pope, and would approve the elevation of
anyone so accused.
This is why the Catholic Church, from Bishops in Boston to the Vatican
itself, is riddled with homosexuals today. This also explains the hysterical
reaction of homosexuals, such as writer Andrew Sullivan, to Cardinal Jozef
Ratzinger succeeding John Paul II as Pope Benedict XVI.
The day of the Habemus Papum (We have a Pope!) announcement on April 19,
Sullivan denounced the new pontiff as a Grand Inquisitor who had
declared a war on modernity and would launch a attack on individual freedom. Yes,
the famous commentator who once pretended to be conservative has figured it out:
the Catholic Church is now going to be in forthright moral opposition to the
modernity of homosexual priests and the individual freedom of molesting
young boys.
As the Dean of the College of Cardinals and the Prefect of the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Ratzinger learned who the homosexuals
are in the Vatican and the almost 3,000 dioceses in the world. As Pope Benedict
XVI, he will encourage their departure from the priesthood.
In his Good Friday homily this year, he condemned thefilth there is in the
Church,making it clear he was referring to priest-pedophiles. In a Letter to
the Bishops composed in 1986 and printed in the National Catholic Register, he wrote:
Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it
is a more or less strong tendency ordered to an intrinsic moral evil, and
thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder.
He clearly recognizes what the media calls the Church's 'sex-abuse
scandal' is a left-wing excuse to attack Catholicism as such, because the media never condemned and always tried to cover-up the pederasty causing the scandal. He
thus condemns the attack:
In the Church, priests also are sinners. But I am personally convinced that
the constant presence in the press of the sins of Catholic priests, especially
in the United States, is a planned campaign, as the percentage of these
offences among priests is not higher than in other categories, and perhaps it is
even lower.
As a genuine Christian who believes in forgiveness and understanding, he
despises the mistreatment of homosexuals:
It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of
violent malice in speech or in action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from
the Church's pastors wherever it occurs.
Yet however much sympathy he has for an individuals struggle with an
inclination towards homosexuality, he nonetheless views its practice as an
intrinsic moral evil,and will not tolerate its presence in his Church.
The hate and vindictiveness of homosexuals such as Sullivan is made most
obvious when he declares his wish for a coming civil war within
Catholicism brought about by Benedict XVI. Blinded by their prejudices, they do no see there will be noemptying of pews,noaccelerating exodus among American
Catholics, as they hope for. Just the opposite. There will be a return to the
pews, an accelerating influx, as Pope Benedict XVI returns his Church to
traditional morality.
Benedict XVI is going to give people what they spiritually hunger for and no
longer find in their pews today: a firm place to make their moral stand. This
Pope is going to regenerate the moral revival of Christianity to the great
benefit of all Christendom, to the great benefit of Western Civilization, and
to the great frustration of its enemies.
posted by Joseph P. McNamara at 10:49 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home